Deepfake Audio Social Engineering Scenario
Scenario Overview
Exercise Type: Executive-Level Crisis Simulation Target Audience: CISO, Legal Counsel, Communications Leadership, Fraud Investigation Teams Scenario: AI Voice Cloning Attack Leading to Financial Fraud & Data Thef Duration: 120-150 minutes Exercise Objective: Validate cross-functional response to synthetic media exploitation targeting financial systems
Facilitator Guidelines
- Emphasize real-time decision-making under regulatory pressure
- Highlight coordination between finance, IT, and external partners
- Track synthetic media detection capabilities
- Simulate evolving media scrutiny and investor reactions
Exercise Script
INJECT 1: Unauthorized Wire Transfer (Day 1 - 09:18 AM)
Situation:
- Treasury team processes $3.2M transfer to Banco de Costa Rica per "CFO" phone authorization:
- Caller ID spoofed to match CFO's direct line
- Voice biometrics initially cleared by IVR system
- Urgent request cited "confidential M&A due diligence"
- Payment flagged post-settlement by AML system for unusual beneficiary patterns
Facilitator Notes:
- Observe fraud reversal protocol awareness
- Note discussions about synthetic voice detection thresholds
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What immediate actions with correspondent banks? How validate authorization authenticity?"
INJECT 2: Deepfake Confirmation (Day 1 - 11:45 AM)
Situation:
- Voice forensic analysis reveals:
- 97% match to CFO's vocal print but abnormal pauses
- Background noise patterns inconsistent with CFO's office
- AI artifact traces in high-frequency vocal bands
- Call metadata shows:
- Originated from VoIP provider in Belarus
- 14-second call setup latency suggesting TOR routing
Facilitator Notes:
- Assess synthetic media investigation workflows
- Note debates about public disclosure timing
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What internal communications policy applies? When involve law enforcement agencies?"
INJECT 3: Lateral Account Compromise (Day 1 - 2:30 PM)
Situation:
- Okta logs show attacker used stolen session cookies to:
- Create API client with full Accounting Hub access
- Disable MFA enforcement policies for 14 service accounts
- Export 18 months of ACH transaction histories
- Exfiltrated data appears on darknet marketplace with:
- Sample buyer lists and payment terms
- Offer to "prove legitimacy" via fresh transaction records
Facilitator Notes:
- Evaluate identity provider hardening measures
- Note discussions about API secret rotation
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What containment steps for exposed financial data? How prevent certificate abuse?"
INJECT 4: Vendor System Breach (Day 2 - 8:45 AM)
Situation:
- Payment processor notifies [WithPCI.com Company Name] of:
- Unusual API calls from legacy webhook endpoints
- 9,812 fraudulent refund requests issued overnight
- $870K in disputed transactions across 14 currencies
- Forensic timeline links activity to:
- Compressed TLS sessions using RFC 8479 (0-RTT)
- Reused authentication tokens from mobile SDK v2.1.4
Facilitator Notes:
- Assess third-party incident response coordination
- Note discussions about payment gateway failover
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What contractual obligations exist with processors? How implement emergency transaction holds?"
INJECT 5: Media Frenzy (Day 2 - 11:30 AM)
Situation:
- Financial Times headline:
"[WithPCI.com Company Name] AI Fraud Debacle: When Machines Mimic Leadership"
- CNBC interview with "blockchain analyst" claims:
- 14K customer bank accounts exposed
- Board members liquidating shares
- Social listening tools detect:
- 280% increase in brand sentiment negativity
- #DeepfakeFraud trending across 7 countries
Facilitator Notes:
- Observe crisis communication strategies
- Note discussions about Regulation FD compliance
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What public statement balances transparency with liability? How counter misinformation?"
INJECT 6: Regulatory Fallout (Day 3 - 9:00 AM)
Situation:
- SEC subpoena demands:
- All voice authentication system documentation
- Board communications regarding AI fraud risks
- Insider trading reports for C-suite members
- EU DPA initiates GDPR Article 33 non-compliance proceedings citing:
- 72-hour notification delay
- Insufficient pseudonymization of payment data
Facilitator Notes:
- Highlight cross-jurisdictional legal challenges
- Note discussions about D&O insurance coverage
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What discovery protections exist for internal investigations? How align legal/PR strategies?"
INJECT 7: Long-Term Remediation (Day 30 - 10:00 AM)
Situation:
- Post-incident metrics:
- $4.1M unrecovered funds
- 22% decrease in B2B transaction volume
- AA credit rating downgraded to A-
- Implemented controls:
- Quantum-resistant voice biometrics
- Hardware security modules for payment approvals
- Synthetic media red team program
Facilitator Notes:
- Focus on security ROI justification
- Note discussions about AI ethics frameworks
DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What metrics define program success? How rebuild partner trust in authentication systems?"
Exercise Debrief
Strategic Focus Areas:
- Synthetic Media Detection Architectures
- Payment Fraud Kill Chains
- Cross-Border Regulatory Navigation
- Executive Protection Protocols
- Third-Party Risk Transfer
After-Action Deliverables:
- Deepfake Incident Response Playbook
- Voice Biometric Assurance Framework
- Payment API Security Standard
- Board-Level AI Risk Dashboard
Next Steps:
- Conduct purple team exercise simulating vishing upgrades
- Implement mandatory media authenticity training
- Schedule semi-annual synthetic media fire drills
Your perspective on this PCI DSS requirement matters! Share your implementation experiences, challenges, or questions below. Your insights help other organizations improve their compliance journey and build a stronger security community.Comment Policy