WithPCI Logo
WithPCI.com

Insider Threat Post-Layoff Scenario

Scenario Overview

Exercise Type: Technical Simulation Tabletop Exercise Target Audience: SOC Analysts, IT Security Teams, Network Engineers, HR Business Partners Scenario: Malicious Insider Compromise Following Workforce Reduction Duration: 120-150 minutes Exercise Objective: Validate response capabilities to privileged account abuse and systemic infrastructure sabotage


Facilitator Guidelines

  • Emphasize coordination between HR and security teams
  • Focus on Active Directory recovery procedures and DNS forensic analysis
  • Track evidence preservation requirements
  • Simulate real-time pressure with escalating injects

Exercise Script

INJECT 1: Initial Access Issues (Day 1 - 08:45 AM)

Situation:

  • Help desk receives 127 tickets within first hour of operations:
    • Users report "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed" errors
    • Multiple domain-joined Linux servers failing SSH key authentication
    • Azure AD hybrid join status showing "Needs Attention" for 43% of devices

Facilitator Notes:

  • Observe initial triage procedures
  • Note discussions about credential churn vs. infrastructure sabotage

DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What diagnostic steps would you take? How prioritize between user impact vs. security investigation?"


INJECT 2: Authentication Failure Analysis (Day 1 - 10:15 AM)

Situation:

  • Security team findings:
    • Domain controllers rejecting valid Kerberos tickets (error 0x6FB)
    • Wireshark captures show NTLM fallback attempts being blocked
    • Event ID 4769 (Kerberos service ticket operations) spiking by 1400%
  • HR provides list of 87 employees terminated during layoffs

Facilitator Notes:

  • Evaluate understanding of Kerberos authentication chain
  • Note discussions about golden ticket detection

DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What forensic artifacts would you collect from domain controllers? How validate genuine vs. spoofed authentication attempts?"


INJECT 3: EDR Policy Tampering (Day 1 - 1:30 PM)

Situation:

  • CrowdStrike Falcon console audit reveals:
    • All prevention policies disabled at 2025-04-25T17:32:00Z (Friday post-layoffs)
    • Modification trace:
      • User: mickey_mouse@internal
      • Source IP: 10.5.16.22 (Terminated sysadmin's workstation)
  • Network logs show:
    • Sustained RDP connections to Domain Controller from 10.5.16.22
    • DNS AXFR requests to non-authoritative nameservers

Facilitator Notes:

  • Assess chain of custody procedures for terminated employee devices
  • Note discussions about policy enforcement bypass techniques

DISCUSSION PROUT: "How would you safely re-enable EDR controls? What safeguards prevent policy tampering recurrence?"


INJECT 4: Domain Controller Compromise (Day 1 - 3:00 PM)

Situation:

  • DC forensic analysis reveals:
    • LMHosts file modification redirecting LDAP traffic to 127.0.0.1
    • New hidden admin account:
      • Username: Mickey_Mouse
      • SID: S-1-5-21-3623811015-3361044348-30300820-500
      • Last logon: 2025-04-25T17:45:00Z
  • Security team identifies:
    • 14 new GPOs pushing malicious registry edits
    • DFS replication to rogue server at 192.168.5.33

Facilitator Notes:

  • Evaluate AD forest recovery strategies
  • Note discussions about system hardening baseline verification

DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What immediate containment steps for compromised DCs? How verify GPO integrity across the enterprise?"


INJECT 5: Credential Harvesting Evidence (Day 2 - 9:00 AM)

Situation:

  • Memory forensics on terminated workstation reveals:
    • Mimikatz residues with DC sync commands
    • 28,456 harvested credentials in plaintext
    • Scheduled task calling: powershell -ep bypass -c "Invoke-MassCredentials -Target OU=Finance"
  • HR identifies Mickey_Mouse account matches terminated employee's pet name

Facilitator Notes:

  • Highlight need for privileged access management controls
  • Note discussions about credential lifecycle management

DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What credential rotation strategy would you implement? How handle service account dependencies?"


INJECT 6: DNS Infrastructure Sabotage (Day 2 - 1:45 PM)

Situation:

  • Network team reports:
    • Authoritative DNS servers returning NXDOMAIN for internal zones
    • External DNS resolution redirected to 104.18.25.93 (malicious comedy site)
    • DNSSEC validation failures across all recursive resolvers
  • Packet captures show:
    • TSIG key abuse for zone transfers
    • Dynamic updates deleting A/AAAA records

Facilitator Notes:

  • Evaluate DNS forensic investigation techniques
  • Note discussions about DNSSEC rollover procedures

DISCUSSION PROMPT: "How would you rebuild DNS infrastructure? What validation steps ensure resolution integrity?"


INJECT 7: Post-Recovery Validation (Day 5 - 10:00 AM)

Situation:

  • Current state:
    • 100% credential rotation completed
    • New isolated domain forest deployed
    • 93% systems migrated to clean environment
  • Remaining issues:
    • Legacy HVAC system still authenticating to old domain
    • 14 IoT devices with hardcoded DNS to malicious IP
    • Pending HR litigation over privacy violations

Facilitator Notes:

  • Focus on business continuity vs. security tradeoffs
  • Note discussions about IoT security policies

DISCUSSION PROMPT: "What metrics define recovery completion? How prevent similar insider sabotage?"


Exercise Debrief

Technical Focus Areas:

  1. Active Directory Forest Recovery
  2. DNS Infrastructure Hardening
  3. Privileged Access Workflow Review
  4. Termination Procedures Automation
  5. Defense-in-Depth Against Insider Threats

After-Action Deliverables:

  • Privileged session monitoring implementation plan
  • Dynamic DNS update authentication controls
  • Layoff-specific security playbook
  • Mandatory vacation policy for sysadmins

Next Steps:

  • Conduct purple team exercise testing termination procedures
  • Implement FIDO2 hardware tokens for admin access
  • Schedule quarterly insider threat simulation drills

Your perspective on this PCI DSS requirement matters! Share your implementation experiences, challenges, or questions below. Your insights help other organizations improve their compliance journey and build a stronger security community.Comment Policy